Recently attended a panel that was titled “The Future of Learning”. I was expecting the panel to share more on how they see learning going forward and how individuals can start preparing themselves for a new learning paradigm or to be more precised, how lifelong learning will be going forward tightly coupled with the technology development. I was disappointed that it was not covered, given that a panelist came from an institution of higher learning dealing with degrees and short courses, while another panelists is from the Learning & Development side of a bank. To be fair, there was still good content shared, just that the person who approved of the title created the mis-matched in expectations.
In training or mentoring others, it's hard to remember where I was 10 years. 10,000 hours? I probably have 20,000 and I was creating my own curriculum. I tend to be slower in what I learn now but my thoughts about what I read are more subjective and experiential. Raw memorization of an uninitiated mind was much faster, but maybe not as useful.
In training or mentoring others, it's hard to remember where I was 10 years. 10,000 hours? I probably have 20,000 and I was creating my own curriculum. I tend to be slower in what I learn now but my thoughts about what I read are more subjective and experiential. Raw memorization of an uninitiated mind was much faster, but maybe not as useful.
Your last statement is definitely food for thought. Tks for sharing!